I think people instantly assumed it was for Content Farms only since Blekko a new search engine announced a ban of a few content material farms from their site in late January/early February see info on that here so I guess folks just theory it’s precisely what Google was doing, too. According to a piece of writing on Wired. com, when Google rolled out Caffeine at case study solution end of 2009 a Google update of types that more advantageous Googles ability find and index content material very easily, they discovered their index was growing to be VERY quicklyand this latest update is almost to thin out case study answer index and get some case study solution junk of out of case study answer way and in try and get case study solution better content ranking above case study answer shallow content. But in case study answer last day or so we introduced an attractive big algorithmic improvement to our rankinga change that highly impacts 11. 8% of our queriesThat statement leads ME to agree with that they were concentrated on bound weak areas. Yes, 11.